data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a349/1a349948fea9f5a84e804f626fd21c322960b7d0" alt="Bitcasa pitch"
I’m not completely sold on CloudsFS but am looking forward to seeing the sort of applications that developers use it for. How much work is it for an app developer to use AWS storage to power the file sharing aspects of her app?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d87f5/d87f51aed9844012d1836797691c9e4c54c65982" alt="bitcasa pitch bitcasa pitch"
Sure it’s a little more “blocky” and doesn’t include all the collaboration functions that Bitcasa does – but it’s also cheap and cheerful and a well known quantity. The other difficulty that Bitcasa has is the ready availability of raw storage from Amazon, Google and others. Bitcasa is the personal app that integrates infinite. Built full recruiting process and projects from ground up. Rather than meeting with a human PR team, startups enter their information into a PressFriendly pitch builder which helps them to hone their. Built business models and pitch decks as well as met and managed investors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c056/3c056b6c2daf2410bf13bdf0d1930cc8ee274e8d" alt="bitcasa pitch bitcasa pitch"
On the other hand Box and Dropbox have both pushed incredibly hard to build developer ecosystems – true the products being built by those developers clearly show that the file sharing aspects are powered by the respective platform vendor (Box or Dropbox in this case), but I don’t perceive that as a huge barrier. The whole thing works like a kind of virtual agency. Bitcasa’s pitch now is to ‘make public cloud storage simple’ by offering a series. Sure it doesn’t give developers the option to white label a product, but from a functional perspective it’s pretty close. Meanwhile Bitcasa had already discontinued the unlimited storage feature it began with as a startup back in 2011. Google Drive is an example of a product that has pretty broad APIs. Deleting user data with one months notice doesnt seem like the right track record for a B2B pitch.I mean, no matter how low the B2B cost of their. It’s an interesting approach, but a difficult one for Bitcasa to succeed with for a number of reasons. Bitcasa is pitching this as “ iCloud in a box” – the ability to get a fully functional file sharing solution as a developer tool. I lead, advise, and coach startup teams of talented intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs from some of the world's largest. In terms of some applications that have been built using the CloudFS beta - these range from a streaming radio show, to photography studio file sharing, and video website upload and delivery applications. The company notes that a large number of development shops have also registered to use CloudFS for client projects. Essentially developers can use all of Bitcasa’s storage and sharing functionality, but within their own applications and branding. CloudFS is a cloud-based file system which is reachable via APIs. The company is making its CloudFS generally available. But what Bitcasa is hoping will create an edge for itself is its approach to be the “file storage engine” that developers use. So far we haven’t heard anything different. OKpanda Kwaga CluckCluck Trello Firebase Clip Bitcasa Snips CityPockets. Bitcasa, like the competition, is cross platform, geographically dispersed and offers a highly scalable and secure storage platform. Themer Telegram MovieLaLa Pitch Sensorberg Ossia BillGuard Miradore Porch. One vendor grappling with this problem is Bitcasa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a349/1a349948fea9f5a84e804f626fd21c322960b7d0" alt="Bitcasa pitch"